FTC and APEC: New Case Involves Cross-Border Privacy featured image

FTC and APEC: New Case Involves Cross-Border Privacy

by John DiGiacomo

Partner

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act gives the FTC the power to prevent and punish unfair business practices in all aspects of business within the United States. The FTC usually involves itself when companies purposefully mislead the public in facts about the company’s business. Recently, the FTC published its first case regarding the Asia-Pacific Economic Corporation (APEC) Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) system.

The FTC issues a complaint when it has reason to believe that some form of the FTC Act has been violated. In this case, the company in question was Very Incognito, Inc. operating under the name of Vipvape. According to the FTC, Vipvape claimed to be part of the CBPR system, but APEC had not actually certified the company according to the complainant.

What is the CBPR system?

The CPBR system is operated and supported by the APEC. APEC is a forum for Pacific Rim economies to help promote and regulate growing economies, and was formed in 1989. One of its initiatives includes the CBPR system, which is a voluntary accreditation system that allows for a member state’s businesses to voluntarily apply for and receive recognition if the business properly meets the CPBR standards. APEC’s CPBR aims to reduce barriers to information flows, enhance consumer privacy, and promote interoperability.

Once reviewed and accepted, the business may advertise and promote that it is part of the CPBR system. Companies often advertise this accreditation to bolster reputation and esteem.

Why did Vipvape get in trouble for advertising its membership?

According to the FTC report, Vipvape was never a full member of the CPBR system, so it had no right to advertise as such on its website. Because of this, it directly fell under the FTC Act, according to the complainant. The FTC has issued rulings and settlements regarding misleading advertisements before, but this is the first time it has been in correlation with the CPBR system. The FTC previously published an advisory page to help avoid this type of false advertisement.

The vote to accept the consent agreement passed 3-0. After the publishing of the settlement form, the public has 30 days to comment before it will be decided by the Commission to become final. The settlement bars Vipvape from continuing to misrepresent its participation, membership, or certification in any privacy or security program sponsored by a government or self-regulatory organization.

For more information about the FTC Act and how it could impact your company’s advertising, contact Revision Legal’s Corporate attorneys through the form on this page or by calling 888-317-5945.

 

Image courtesy of Flickr user Ecig Click

Extra, Extra!
Recent Posts

2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

Trademark

There are some significant changes coming to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) that will affect trademark filings beginning January 18, 2025. These changes include the introduction of the Trademark Center, new fees, and revised application requirements. Here is an overview of the key changes: The USPTO will retire the TEAS system, which […]

Read more about 2025 Changes to Trademark Fees

Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

Internet Law

In today’s competitive e-commerce landscape, automated decision-making technology is becoming more and more important. From personalized product recommendations to targeted advertising and streamlined logistics, these systems help ecommerce businesses adapt and grow. But new regulations are on the horizon, and these changes could reshape the way e-commerce businesses use automation. The California Privacy Protection Agency […]

Read more about Automated Decision-Making Technology: California Releases Proposed Regulations

FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

Internet Law

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued final amendments to its trade regulation rule concerning negative option plans, also known as the “click to cancel rule.” This rule aims to address widespread deceptive practices that prohibit customers from cancelling services in the same manner in which they signed up. Here’s a detailed summary of the […]

Read more about FTC Adopts Final “Click to Cancel Rule”

Put Revision Legal on your side