ASUS, a Taiwan-based computer company, has recently agreed to settle with the Federal Trade Commission over charges stemming from insecure routers and cloud services. The complaint alleged that ASUS compromised the personal information of hundreds of thousands of consumers with hardware that failed to meet federal regulations for security. The FTC found that ASUS did not address security flaws in a timely manner and did not communicate properly the risk these flaws posed to its customers. With the rapid growth of the Internet of Things, customers have more information at risk than ever before and secure routers are pivotal in protecting that information.
The Internet of Things
The Internet of Things is an increasingly expanding network of physical objects that have the ability to connect to the internet. When embedded with software, everyday electronics like washing machines, lamps, and watches can have the ability to connect to the internet and communicate, allowing remote access to the object. This technology has expanded beyond commercial products and has penetrated the industrial market such as use in drills of oil rigs and optimization of supply chain networks. Additionally, consumers have the ability to hook up their houses to the Internet of Things, allowing owners remote access to their security systems and any other connected device. If these systems are compromised due to ineffective router security, there is no limit to the amount of information or data that could be at risk.
Risky ASUS Routers
Among the vulnerabilities of the ASUS routers, an attacker had the ability to remotely access the routers in order to alter security settings and configurations. This would allow the attacker to access files stored on the connected devices. According to the complaint, a hacker had the ability to bypass the password protection of these routers and make changes without the owner knowing. ASUS marketed its routers claiming it had various security features that protected customers from unauthorized access and attacks; however, the FTC claims that the company did not take the appropriate steps to ensure customer protection.
In particular, the ASUS cloud-based systems were at risk. Through ASUS’s AiCloud system, owners have the ability to plug a USB hard drive into their router and create a cloud storage device that allows them access from anywhere. By exploiting a vulnerability in the AiCloud service, a hacker could bypass the login screen and access any information stored by the owner. Additionally, the FTC’s charges stated that ASUS did not adequately encrypt consumer files that were transferred from one device to another, allowing public access to these files to anyone with an internet connection.
Settlement Terms
We’ve written previously here, about the FTC’s authority. Under the terms of its settlement with the FTC, ASUS must maintain a comprehensive security program that is subject to independently performed audits for the next 20 years. In addition to the security program, the FTC is ordering that the company educate its customers about software updates and measures they can take to prevent security flaws. One way ASUS can help educate customers is through offering direct security notices (through email, text message, etc.) to ensure its customers are adequately protected. Finally, the FTC’s order will prevent the company from making any misleading statements or claims regarding the security of its products.
Now that the Internet of Things is expanding, and potentially any electronic can be manufactured to include internet connectivity, the need for consumer protection is at an all-time high. The FTC is making an ongoing effort to protect consumers from insecure software and devices. This settlement sends a message to all producers that information and data security must be a top priority when developing their products.
For more information about the Internet of Things and staying protected, contact Revision Legal’s team of experienced Internet attorneys through the form on this page, or call 855-473-8474.
In May 2025, as part of a settlement of litigation involving college football, a new entity was created called the College Sports Commission (“CSC” or “Commission”). See news media reports here and here. Among many other purposes, the CSC will monitor and approve name, image, and likeness (“NIL”) agreements for college athletes. As the term […]
Trademarks are words, designs, symbols, logos, and other things that are used/associated with goods or services that identify the specific commercial source of the goods/services. COCA-COLA, APPLE, and GUCCI are just a few famous examples. If COCA-COLA is on the bottle, consumers know what to expect from the beverage in the bottle. The same for […]
Getting an endorsement deal as a social media influencer may be a seminal event financially and for the progress of your career. However, the question always has to be asked whether your endorsement deal is fair. In other words, are you getting paid what you are worth? There are a number of factors that can […]