Partner
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a necessity for most modern businesses. Companies now use AI tools to write marketing copy, design logos, and even to enhance customer interactions. The speed and cost savings from AI are hard to resist. But behind this efficiency lies a web of legal risks that many businesses underestimate. From copyright dilemmas to privacy violations and false claims, AI can expose your business to serious liability. You just cannot afford to overlook these risks. Below, we explore some of the hidden dangers of AI-generated content.
Copyright law protects works mainly created by humans. That highlights a significant gray area for AI-generated content. When software produces a logo, article, or design from a text prompt, authorship becomes unclear. Did the business create it, or was it the tool that created it?
This uncertainty is a reason for concern for businesses. Imagine you invest heavily in branding built around an AI-generated logo, only to discover you cannot stop a competitor from using a similar design because your ownership rights are weak. In some instances, the AI provider’s terms may grant only a limited license rather than full ownership, restricting how you can use the content.
Artificial Intelligence systems are usually trained using existing material. So, sometimes their outputs may resemble real works, even if no one realizes it at first. If your business publishes that content, you could face infringement claims from the original creator.
Courts generally do not accept “the AI generated it” as a defense. The liability falls on the party that used the alleged infringing material. If you find yourself in such a situation, consequences may include financial damages, forced removal of content, constant rebranding, and legal fees.
If the AI-generated content includes false statements, inaccurate product claims, or misleading information, your business is responsible for publishing it. Remember that AI cannot be sued or held liable for damages. Your business may be exposed in various ways, such as:
In serious cases, executives and decision-makers may face personal exposure if oversight failures are significant.
AI tools sometimes generate confident, accurate-sounding information that is completely wrong. These “hallucinations” can appear in reports, contracts, or promotional materials. If your business publishes inaccurate information, it can trigger contract disputes, reputational damage, and regulatory scrutiny. And sometimes, damage may be challenging to undo if the information is out in the public.
AI systems rely on data, and that data may include personal or sensitive information. If AI-generated content reveals private details or your business processes personal information improperly, you may be held in violation of privacy laws.
You can reduce the risk of AI-generated content without abandoning AI altogether in several ways, including:
For more information, contact the experienced AI Risk and Compliance lawyers at Revision Legal. You can contact us through the form on this page or call (855) 473-8474.
The U.S. Copyright Office has repeatedly declined to register works that lack human authorship. In its February 2023 guidance, the Office stated that it will not register works produced by machines without creative input from a human author. This position was reinforced in Thaler v. Perlmutter, No. 22-1564 (D.D.C. Aug. 18, 2023), where a federal district court upheld the Copyright Office’s refusal to register an image generated entirely by an AI system with no human selection or arrangement of the output. The practical implication is that purely AI-generated content may exist in the public domain, free for competitors to copy. To the extent a business relies on AI content for competitive advantage, the absence of copyright protection is a significant vulnerability.
Large language models and image generators are trained on vast datasets that include copyrighted works. Multiple lawsuits pending as of 2025—including actions involving news publishers, visual artists, and software developers—allege that training on copyrighted material without license constitutes infringement, and that outputs substantially similar to training data are unauthorized derivative works. While these cases are still developing, they highlight a systemic legal risk: AI-generated content may be tainted by the training process itself. If courts find that certain AI outputs constitute infringing derivatives of the training corpus, businesses that published that content will face downstream liability regardless of whether they knew of the underlying training data issues.
The Federal Trade Commission has explicitly addressed AI-generated fake reviews. The FTC’s 2024 rule on consumer reviews and testimonials, 16 C.F.R. Part 465, prohibits the creation or dissemination of fake consumer reviews, including those generated by AI, and provides for civil penalties up to $51,744 per violation. The FTC has also issued guidance warning that using AI to generate false testimonials, fabricated clinical results, or misleading product endorsements violates Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45. Businesses that automate content generation without adequate human review face mounting regulatory exposure as AI detection tools improve and enforcement resources increase.
AI tools that process images, voices, or video of real individuals create specific privacy obligations. Several states—including Illinois (Biometric Information Privacy Act, 740 ILCS 14), Texas (Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 503.001), and Washington (RCW § 19.375)—have enacted laws that require written consent before collecting or using biometric identifiers such as facial geometry, voiceprints, or fingerprints. Illinois’s BIPA has generated hundreds of millions of dollars in class action settlements against companies that used facial recognition or similar AI-powered tools without the required consent. Businesses that use AI tools for employee monitoring, customer facial recognition, or AI-generated synthetic voices derived from real recordings should conduct a careful BIPA and state biometric privacy analysis before deployment.
The agreements governing AI tools contain clauses that significantly affect how generated content can be used commercially. Many AI platforms grant users a license—not an assignment—of generated outputs, often with restrictions on certain use cases. Some enterprise agreements provide stronger intellectual property indemnification, while consumer-grade subscriptions offer none. Before deploying AI-generated content at commercial scale, legal counsel should review the applicable terms to confirm: (1) whether the business holds sufficient rights to use the output for its intended purpose; (2) whether the platform’s indemnification covers IP claims arising from the output; and (3) whether the use complies with the platform’s acceptable use policy.
The most effective way to manage AI content risk is through internal governance. A well-designed AI content policy should include: a defined approval workflow requiring human review of all AI-generated content before publication; a disclosure framework for content that was AI-assisted; a records-retention system that documents the prompts, tools, and versions used; and a regular review cycle to update the policy as the legal landscape evolves. These measures reduce the risk of regulatory violations, strengthen your defense in any IP dispute, and demonstrate that your business exercises reasonable oversight.
The legal risks surrounding AI-generated content are real and evolving rapidly. Revision Legal advises businesses on AI governance policies, IP clearance for AI-generated assets, FTC compliance, and privacy law obligations. Contact us to protect your business, or visit our Internet Law practice page to learn more about the legal landscape for AI in business.
Artificial intelligence has become part of nearly every business operation. Businesses now use AI tools to write marketing copy, generate product images, compose emails, draft social media posts, and produce video and audio content at a scale that was not possible a few years ago. The efficiency gains are real. But so are the legal […]
Read more about The Risks of Using AI-Generated Content in Your Business
Receiving a cease and desist letter can feel alarming. One minute you are running your business as usual, and the next you are staring at a legal demand accusing you of trademark infringement, copyright violation, breach of contract, or some other wrong. The situation can escalate quickly if not handled properly. But receiving a cease […]
Read more about How to Respond to a Cease and Desist Letter
Learn what counts as deceptive pricing in e-commerce, including false discounts, hidden fees, drip pricing, and fake urgency. Revision Legal’s internet law attorneys help online retailers stay compliant with FTC rules.
Read more about What Counts as Deceptive Pricing in E-Commerce?