Partner
If a consumer is led to believe that an ‘ad’ is independent, impartial, or not from the sponsoring advertiser itself, the Commission will not allow it, arguing that the source of the information is important for a consumer to know. For instance, if a consumer sees what appears to be editorial content on a website, but that content is actually a paid advertisement, their perception of the credibility or weight of the ad’s content can be altered. Knowing the source of that material means that the consumer hasn’t been misled and that they’re able to evaluate the information fairly. The recent Policy Statement explains how the FTC will determine whether the content is an ad and whether or not it is clearly identified as such. The main objective of the recent statement is transparency in online advertising. As a general rule, the FTC’s policies have an overarching focus on protecting the consumer (also seen in the enforcement of the ‘Made in USA’ policy), so this isn’t a surprising move.
The Enforcement Policy Statement reviews advertising formats that can potentially be deceptive, and discusses cases where the Commission has found an ad to be deceptive. This includes news formats like newspapers, sales visits and calls, emails with falsified sender information, use of endorsements, and so forth.
The Statement then reviews the Commission’s specific policies and stand on what is deceptive: that deception occurs when there has been a misleading representation that is material. A misleading representation is material when it can impact consumer choices or conduct regarding the product being advertised, and can happen even when the ad’s actual content itself is truthful—if a consumer can’t tell the ad is an ad, that’s also considered a material and misleading representation. The FTC sees either situation as deceptive.
For added guidance, the FTC has a page on their website depicting seventeen different situations with advice on when companies should think about specifically declaring that the consumer is viewing an ad. They strongly suggest that advertisers need to consider the ad as a whole, not just specific statements or visual effects included within the ad.
The FTC provides a list of factors for businesses to consider when creating and posting their ads, including:
In addition to regular ads, these considerations should be applied to any click-on or tap-into page ad, where the advertiser provides a snippet of the ad and entices the consumer to click on the ad, taking the consumer to a page where the full ad will appear.
For more information about the Policy Statement and how it could impact your advertising contact Revision Legal’s Corporate attorneys through the form on this page or by calling 855-473-8474.
In May 2025, as part of a settlement of litigation involving college football, a new entity was created called the College Sports Commission (“CSC” or “Commission”). See news media reports here and here. Among many other purposes, the CSC will monitor and approve name, image, and likeness (“NIL”) agreements for college athletes. As the term […]
Read more about Fairness Factors For Your College NIL Agreement
Trademarks are words, designs, symbols, logos, and other things that are used/associated with goods or services that identify the specific commercial source of the goods/services. COCA-COLA, APPLE, and GUCCI are just a few famous examples. If COCA-COLA is on the bottle, consumers know what to expect from the beverage in the bottle. The same for […]
Read more about Is a “Fanciful” Trademark the Best Type of Trademark?
Getting an endorsement deal as a social media influencer may be a seminal event financially and for the progress of your career. However, the question always has to be asked whether your endorsement deal is fair. In other words, are you getting paid what you are worth? There are a number of factors that can […]
Read more about Is Your Social Media Influencer Endorsement Deal Fair?