Category: Corporate

‘Built in Detroit’ – Does it Fall Under the FTC’s ‘Made in USA’ Requirements?

‘Built in Detroit’ – Does it Fall Under the FTC’s ‘Made in USA’ Requirements?

FTC Revision Legal

Is Shinola “Made in USA,” or do they fall outside the FTC’s scope? Shinola has publicly claimed that despite risking possible contradiction of Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) regulations, they will continue to use “Built in Detroit” as their tagline on watches. The FTC requires that when a product claims that it is “Made in USA” or […]

Read more about ‘Built in Detroit’ – Does it Fall Under the FTC’s ‘Made in USA’ Requirements?

Mobile Gaming Faces New Challenges in Apple App Store

Mobile Gaming Faces New Challenges in Apple App Store

As the app market speeds up, developers are rushing from app conception to coding to cross-platform publication. At the same time, developers are trying to navigate this new marketplace without losing any rights to their creative work. The Apple App Store presents a specific set of guidelines for developers to abide by while creating their […]

Read more about Mobile Gaming Faces New Challenges in Apple App Store

The Distinctive or Famous Mark Requirement in a Cybersquatting Case

The Distinctive or Famous Mark Requirement in a Cybersquatting Case

Revision Legal

The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) makes it illegal to register, use, or traffic in a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar to a distinctive mark, or that is identical or confusingly similar to, or dilutive of, a famous mark, with a “bad faith intent to profit” from the mark. As emphasized above, […]

Read more about The Distinctive or Famous Mark Requirement in a Cybersquatting Case

SEC Adopts Crowdfunding Rules

SEC Adopts Crowdfunding Rules

Revision Legal

The Securities and Exchange Committee (SEC) recently voted to adopt a new set of rules that allows for Regulation Crowdfunding (officially, “debt and equity crowdfunding”). Regulation Crowdfunding is a term used to define a middle ground between crowdfunding platforms (like Kickstarter) and public offerings (like IPO’s). While the former sees little regulation, and the latter […]

Read more about SEC Adopts Crowdfunding Rules

USPTO Rejects Will.i.am’s Application for Trademark Registration

USPTO Rejects Will.i.am’s Application for Trademark Registration

Revision Legal

Will.i.am, otherwise known as William Adams (‘applicant’), was seeking the trademark ‘I AM’ for a collection of cosmetics, beauty and skin care products, and other hygiene related products, among other items. In three decisions released October 7, 2015, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board affirmed a lower decision and refused to register trademarks for celebrity […]

Read more about USPTO Rejects Will.i.am’s Application for Trademark Registration

Utah Court Rejects Section 230 Immunity for RipOff Reports

Utah Court Rejects Section 230 Immunity for RipOff Reports

Revision Legal

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (“CDA”) protects online service providers of interactive websites against liability that can arise from third party content.[1] Section 230(c)(1) provides “[n]o provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”[2] While section […]

Read more about Utah Court Rejects Section 230 Immunity for RipOff Reports

Washington Supreme Court Denies Section 230 Immunity to Backpage.com

Washington Supreme Court Denies Section 230 Immunity to Backpage.com

On September 3, 2015, in a rather unprecedented decision, a majority of the Washington Supreme Court held that Backpage.com, an online service provider, might not be guaranteed the protections provided for under the Communications Decency Act (“CDA”). JS v Village Voice Media Holdings involved minors that were featured in advertisements for sexual services on Backpage.com. The […]

Read more about Washington Supreme Court Denies Section 230 Immunity to Backpage.com

City of Inglewood Must Pay Over $100,000 For Unreasonable Copyright Infringement Lawsuit

City of Inglewood Must Pay Over $100,000 For Unreasonable Copyright Infringement Lawsuit

In City of Inglewood v Joseph Teixeira, the Court found that Teixeira’s use of City Council recordings in his personal critical commentary videos did not violate any kind of copyright laws. The Court’s decision to grant Teixeira’s motion to dismiss was not especially surprising. California state law creates a strong presumption supporting public access to […]

Read more about City of Inglewood Must Pay Over $100,000 For Unreasonable Copyright Infringement Lawsuit

Intellectual Property Protections for Video Games

Intellectual Property Protections for Video Games

Revision Legal

  The video game industry is a global industry, and it is worth $65 billion in the United States (hereinafter U.S.). It is made up of cutting edge technology, creative engineering, and imaginative character and setting designs. The World of Intellectual Property Magazine (hereinafter WIPO Magazine) reports that video games are “the fastest growing sector […]

Read more about Intellectual Property Protections for Video Games

We turn online legalese into crystal clear, actionable takeaways and guidelines you can use to make better decisions for your business.